[bars] Primarily addresing those who attend Sat AM Zoom meeting
JWAHAR BAMMI
jbammi at icloud.com
Wed Dec 16 09:14:34 EST 2020
Highly recommended, especially the slightly more expensive 4” version that makes everything more readable yet you can hook it up to the PC when in the shack. I own both the smaller screen version and the 4” NanoVNA-h and rarely use the original smaller screen version
73 de k1jbd
Bammi
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 16, 2020, at 8:51 AM, Jim Idelson <jim at k1ir.com> wrote:
>
>
> I also have one here in the shack. I have used it to test bandpass filters, to make coaxial phasing lines, and for rough checks of antenna resonance.
>
> I have never used the small screen. Instead, I use software on a Windows machine connected to the instrument via USB. That includes measurements made both on the bench and in the field.
>
> Absolutely worth the money invested, in my opinion.
>
> 73 Jim K1IR
>
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020, 8:19 AM Tony Brock-Fisher via bars <bars at w1hh.org> wrote:
>> I have one and have been using it for bench work extensively. I don't bother with it's tiny screen, which many have objected to. I use it with software running on my PC. It has replaced my miniVNA as the primary instrument for measuring components and networks. Note that neither of the reviews did any comprehensive measurement of it's accuracy. I am assuming that once calibrated it is very accurate - but I have no standard to compare it to.
>>
>> I have not used it for antenna measurements. I suspect, like most similar instruments, it would suffer interference from strong nearby RF fields. I am .6 miles line-of-sight from an AM broadcast tower.
>>
>> For $50 you can't go wrong. I bought the kit with cables and standards from Amazon (sold by Gigaparts) which was around $80, definitely worth it.
>>
>> -Tony, K1KP
>>
>> On 12/16/2020 8:01 AM, Steven Schultz wrote:
>>> We had a brief comment about VNA's (Vector Network Analyzers - a two port measurement device) one morning.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have experience with the "NanoVNA" ?
>>>
>>> It has been discussed in ARRL QST and QEX.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bars mailing list
>>> bars at w1hh.org
>>> http://mail.w1hh.org/mailman/listinfo/bars_w1hh.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> bars mailing list
>> bars at w1hh.org
>> http://mail.w1hh.org/mailman/listinfo/bars_w1hh.org
> _______________________________________________
> bars mailing list
> bars at w1hh.org
> http://mail.w1hh.org/mailman/listinfo/bars_w1hh.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.w1hh.org/pipermail/bars_w1hh.org/attachments/20201216/f2525dfb/attachment.htm>
More information about the bars
mailing list